I am just asking why is there a dinosaur in stone on the temple?
1) How are you confirming it's a dinosaur?
2) If it is, what it more likely, someone who has seen a dinosaur picture put it there for some reason OR all of biology, geology, paleontology, genetics and archeology is wrong?
It looks like a dinosaur. They did not have pictures 800 years ago.
There is a lot of evidence that man existed with dinosaurs.
They did not use the word dinosaur until recently.
They used to be called dragons for one.
It is very possible that a small part of biology is wrong and parts of all the other unscientific sciences are wrong.
The parts that are unscientific could be wrong and the parts that are scientific and follow the scientific method are right.
If you can not demonstrate it and test it it is not scientific. It is on the fringes. It is theory and ideas.